Organizations today face a critical balancing act: leveraging the transformative power of AI while protecting individual privacy and maintaining regulatory compliance. This challenge touches the heart of information governance, and therefore, requires thoughtful consideration.
When approaching an AI implementation, organizations should begin by assessing the time value of different data elements. These are:
For example, you might need transaction information with personally identifiable details during an accounting year. After that period, you may only need to know what products were purchased in which sales region for trend analysis — not who purchased them.
Data minimization is about collecting, processing, and storing only the minimum amount of personal data necessary for a specific purpose. The principle of data minimization should guide your AI implementation strategy:
Various approaches can help you maintain analytical capabilities while protecting privacy:
Consider whether you truly need all the data you're collecting:
When implementing AI systems, consider adopting privacy principles similar to those in the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), California Consumer Protection Act (CCPA), or similar principles in the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA). This means:
This approach is particularly relevant for internal analysis. For example, if you are using small language models for HR analysis or succession planning, you likely don't need employees' names and addresses — age, demographics, and regional information might suffice.
The quality threshold required for your data depends on its intended use. For example, when you're selling addresses to an organization for bulk mailing, the difference between having one wrong address per 10,000 versus one wrong address per 1 million has significant implications. When mailing to a million addresses, that error rate difference could be a substantial cost to the organization that is sending the mail. Similarly, when feeding data into AI systems, understanding your quality requirements and error tolerance is critical to both effectiveness and privacy protection.
The key to balancing AI innovation with privacy protection lies in:
By taking this strategic approach, you can harness AI's capabilities while respecting privacy concerns and regulatory requirements — ultimately building more sustainable, responsible AI systems, while delivering valuable business outcomes and results.
This blog post is based on an original AIIM OnAir podcast. When recording podcasts, AIIM uses AI-enabled transcription in Zoom. We then use that transcription as part of a prompt with Claude Pro, Anthropic’s AI assistant. AIIM staff (aka humans) then edit the output from Claude for accuracy, completeness, and tone. In this way, we use AI to increase the accessibility of our podcast and extend the value of great content.