I was recently talking to an AIIM member about accessing documents related to a project that we were both working on. So this will not be viewed as some sort of tacit endorsement, I’ll leave the name of the vendor out, but it’s a significant player in the enterprise sync and share space. I’ll also leave out the name of the AIIM member so he/she won’t get into trouble!
But I think this short story illustrates the totally unrealistic and counter-productive way most enterprises are looking at the incursion of consumer technologies into the enterprise. Consider the following.
When I mentioned the specific cloud file repository we were using for the project, the AIIM member said they couldn’t access the site because the "domain was blocked at work." As we talked about the implications of this, an old adage of mine came to mind -- the desire of the “business” to get work done by individuals will always trump our desire for organizational “control” of information.
The response of the AIIM member was this (paraphrasing): “It won’t be a huge problem to get around it. I’ll access the documents at home on a personal device, and then forward them to myself at work for reference during our conference call.”
Truth be told, this kind of stuff occurs all the time. And yet so many organizations persist in putting their heads in the sand and assume that if they wish it so (“we’ll keep information under control by just blocking the domain”), it will be so.
Our upcoming ECM Industry Watch provides some data documenting the head in the sand approach most organizations are taking when it comes to thinking about the question of mobile accessibility and the REAL patterns of how knowledge work is actually done in the year 2015.
Consider the answers to this question: What progress are you making towards content and process access on mobile devices? Is it any wonder that user adoption and utilization of most ECM systems remains a significant problem?
The upcoming Industry Watch notes that 60% of organizations that have deployed ECM solutions agree with the statement, “Gaining user adoption has been a big problem for our ECM project.” 62% agree with the statement, "We still rely on file shares." And this is among organizations with ECM solutions!
I think a lot of this comes from a miscalculation of the true nature of information risk -- calculations that for many organizations are based on the outdated assumption that users have no choice with regards to the tools they use and that we can continue to "control" things the same way we did when all knowledge work was done at a desktop computer and in an office and on equipment owned and issued by central IT casting.
This comment from Michael Coleman, SVP & CIO at Comporium Communications illustrates the challenge facing organizations as they recalibrate risk in an era of consumerization and disruption:
“Deciding where to let go is a key element in managing overall risk. You need to decide what are actually corporate assets, and push processes to make sure they live in a specific place. There are not enough people to manage the volume. Make sure you get that foundational layer right.”
Alan Pelz-Sharpe spoke at the AIIM Conference about this challenge under the description of the “fragmented enterprise” and offers this advice to organizations:
All of which brings me to a previous post: ECM in the era of Digital Disruption - When Riding a Dead Horse, Dismount.
We need to think about the question of information management and information security from a different vantage point – that of the knowledge worker – rather than that of central IT control. Because to be sustainable in an era of consumerization and digital disruption, a strategy must answer two questions for knowledge workers:
Where do I put my “stuff” so that it is secure, shareable, and searchable so that my ORGANIZATION can accomplish its goals?
AND
Where do I put my “stuff” so that it works the way I work and is useful to ME in getting my job done?
Until we recalibrate our strategies to deal with BOTH these questions, we will struggle to achieve a true strategy to effectively manage our information assets.