As an information management professional, I've observed a concerning trend in the rush to adopt artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, particularly when the stakes are high. There's a significant disconnect between the allure of these powerful AI tools and the reality of most organizations' data readiness. This disconnect, which I call the "data delusion," poses significant challenges for successful AI implementation, especially in critical decision-making scenarios.
When we talk about AI implementation, it's crucial to distinguish between low-stakes and high-stakes applications. We're not just talking about using AI to refine a tweet or generate marketing copy. The real challenges – and potential risks – arise when we use AI for tasks with significant consequences:
In these scenarios, the output of AI systems directly influences critical business decisions and strategies. The ramifications of inaccurate or biased AI output in these contexts can be substantial and far-reaching.
At its heart, every task we perform in our professional roles comes down to decision-making. Whether we're serving government, commercial, or non-profit sectors, we're constantly making choices that affect the people we serve. These decisions must be based on the best available information.
When AI is involved in generating or analyzing this information, we need to be extra vigilant. If the AI's output is based on poor quality data, unsecured information, or biased algorithms, the consequences can be severe. This is why robust information management practices are more critical than ever in high-stakes AI implementations.
As we integrate AI into critical business processes, we need to evolve our information management practices:
Despite the power of AI, it's crucial to remember that these are tools to assist human decision-making, not replace it. Just as we don't blindly trust spell-check to catch every error, we can't rely solely on AI for critical decisions.
Every AI-generated output in a high-stakes environment needs human oversight and judgment. We must ask:
As we navigate the AI revolution in high-stakes environments, it's clear that information management practices aren't becoming obsolete – they're becoming more critical than ever. Our role as information managers is evolving, but our expertise in managing, structuring, and deriving value from information remains invaluable.
By maintaining and adapting our information management frameworks, we can help our organizations harness the full potential of AI while mitigating risks and ensuring ethical use of data. This is particularly crucial in high-stakes scenarios where AI output can significantly impact business decisions and strategies.
The future of work isn't just about AI – it's about the powerful combination of AI and robust information management practices, underpinned by human judgment and ethical considerations. Let's embrace this future, armed with our expertise and ready to adapt to new challenges, ensuring that AI remains a powerful tool for good in our organizations.
Join AIIM as we discuss the intersection between unstructured data and AI at the AI+IM Global Summit, being held March 31-April 2, 2025. Learn more at https://www.aiim.org/global-summit-2025.
This blog post is based on an original AIIM OnAir podcast. When recording podcasts, AIIM uses AI-enabled transcription in Zoom. We then use that transcription as part of a prompt with Claude Pro, Anthropic’s AI assistant. AIIM staff (aka humans) then edit the output from Claude for accuracy, completeness, and tone. In this way, we use AI to increase the accessibility of our podcast and extend the value of great content.