Mention the word “logistics,” and odds are the person on the other end will conjure up images of some massive and complex military operation – and the challenge of reporting upon military logistics in some intelligent way.
“Logistics” also conjures up images of complicated supply chains, and the Rube Goldberg-esque complexities of summarizing, rationalizing, and reporting on them in an intelligent way.
In a modern digital organization, “Logistics” doesn’t just refer to the movement of people or physical objects. Organizations face complex information logistics challenges in coordinating all of the various unconnected content silos that have arisen over the past 15 years – and continue to multiply as more and more SaaS and consumer technologies are adopted by newly empowered line of business executives.
AIIM reports that 52% of organizations have three or more ECM/DM/RM systems and 22% have five or more systems. The problem is even more challenging at the largest organizations, with 38% reporting more than five ECM/DM/RM systems in operation. Of course, the information that is officially in ECM/DM/RM systems is only part of the information management story in most organizations.
Organizations have long struggled with these core “information logistics” questions:
Here are three reasons why these core information logistics issues are more challenging than ever before:
A new generation of content management solutions is hitting the marketplace. This has created pressure in many organizations to take advantage of these solutions. However, given than most ECM solutions perform a mission-critical function, simply yanking them out and replacing them is not a decision to be taken lightly. Forrester notes, “Most organizations struggle with migrating legacy content from old ECM systems.”
One solution is to adopt a two-stage “information logistics” strategy, first SYNCING with the newer system, and then eventually MIGRATING into the new system.
File sync and share solutions – some enterprise- capable (EFSS) and some consumer versions (CFSS) -- are everywhere. Osterman Research notes the following challenges tied to managing this content – and creating a predictable structure to surface and manage this content at the organizational level:
“A significant proportion of corporate content is stored in third party CFSS (typically cloud-based) repositories outside the control of the corporate IT and/or security departments. This creates a situation in which content can bypass corporate archiving systems and so becomes unavailable when the organization needs it for early case assessments, eDiscovery, litigation hold, regulatory compliance or other purposes.”
The SaaS revolution started by Salesforce – making enterprise grade process automation available to companies of all sizes – is still in its early stages. The “business” now has the power to implement single-process solutions – often without a lot of IT involvement.
While this eases immediate process pain, it also raises long-term questions about the availability of content assets for processes outside of the target SaaS application. Most processes connect with other processes, and most content assets are needed in more than one process. Think about how a contract is critical not only to the Contracts Administrator, but also to the CFO and Legal Counsel and Sales and.... This creates a need to surface SaaS content in multiple applications – a challenging “information logistics” problem for many organizations.