In my post SharePoint Lover, Partner, or Skeptic? 20 Data Points You Need to Know I took a look at some of the highlights of our recent SharePoint research. The core conclusion was this: SharePoint is still being adopted -- but rather chaotically, with mixed results, and with a lot of confusion re Office365 and the cloud.
In the post, I encouraged readers to respond to the question, "If you had 30 seconds with Satya Nadella (Microsoft CEO), what would you tell him about the future of SharePoint? Here are a few of the responses.
Don't add more features. Focus instead on making it smart, simple, secure, and sexy. And don't forget Mac users.
There will be a REALLY long on-premise tail to SharePoint no matter how fast people would like to go to the cloud, and thus hybrid information governance -- not an easy task -- will be with us for many years.
Don't forget your customers who don't want to move to the cloud. Will we still be your customers in 2 years? In 5 years?
I know SharePoint wants us all in the cloud ASAP, but moving to the cloud isn't the answer to everything for everyone. I'd love to see more focus on the hybrid customers.
It seems (from recent posts and dropped hints) that there is a renewed level of interest and commitment from Microsoft to hybrid scenarios, which is good to know. Hybrid or blended solutions will have to be the new normal for most customers for the next 2 to 6 (or more!) years as the feature sets evolve, get retired, or are matured on each of the platform levels. Counting on that commitment will be critical for customers, but it needs to be accompanied by clear and articulated visions and guidelines so that customers can deploy the right solutions in the right ways on the right platforms.
Some capabilities are clearly strong in the cloud (i.e., video content), while other features seem to be unavailable or disappearing as cloud options (i.e., branded UI, custom code, public sites, etc.). As cloud features are dropped, please have in place viable alternatives (perhaps through partners?) and guidelines on how to transition.
Also, tightly integrated/blended/hybrid solutions will be required until valid and reliable 3rd party add-ons can run as completely in the cloud as they currently do on-premises. Most fall well short currently, so the on-premises parts of the overall SharePoint solution for many customers will have to continue to be supported for quite some time.
Organizations that have embraced a true, robust Enterprise Content Management (ECM)/Business Process Management (BPM) strategy understand that there is not a single, magic solution. Many of these successful organizations leverage the strengths of SharePoint's content repository and federated search within an infrastructure that includes complimentary software that is best in class for workflow, RM, case management, etc. It would be great if Microsoft focused on making SharePoint spectacular at its strengths and stop trying to rebuild the wheel in the areas that are not strengths. I've seen too many cases where SharePoint was sold as the end-all and be-all for ECM, and the IT staff spent too much time and money building bespoke systems that could have been point-and-click configured with off-the-shelf software.
From the report, you can see one of the major issues is user adoption and training. I've heard this for years. Not to pitch a solution but more of an interesting concept, these guys at Content Panda have built a pretty robust plug-in for SharePoint that enhances the built-in help to offer tutorials from around the web. I can only see training concepts like this helping with user adoption.
Make it easy to integrate Sharepoint with any other enterprise systems, and don't try to make it into a solution that can solve all enterprise needs, focus on its core capabilities. When it comes to the cloud, make sure that all security concerns are addressed and understood.
SharePoint is great if you need flexibility and little structure (e.g., collaboration). But a lot of companies have complex requirements related to case/claim management, workflow, and RM where other solutions provide standard functionalities. Combining the strength of various solutions increases the user acceptance but also increases the complexity of managing these solutions for IT. Making this a bit easier would be nice. This means, among other things, good monitoring, upgrade processes, professional transport systems from development systems to Quality and Productive Systems, and audit trails.
Remember your customers and what they actually need. Get out and see how people are actually using your technologies then use that insight as you develop the next generation of products.